Skip to content
Last Updated 06/29/2026

No Safe
Harbor

Last Updated 06/29/26
Asia’s Continued Exposure to Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz

About This Project

The Strait of Hormuz is the world’s most important oil chokepoint, and a distribution center for the global economy. Its closure revealed how much, and how unevenly, Asia depends on it.

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off a quarter of the world’s seaborne oil and nearly a fifth of its LNG, along with the petrochemicals, fertilizers, metals, helium, and sulfur that feed manufacturing, agriculture, and consumer markets worldwide. Asia bore the earliest and heaviest costs, but the effects were anything but uniform: countries, industries, and households entered the crisis with their own exposure and capacity to absorb the impact of the crisis. Each is emerging from it differently. Even as the Strait moves toward reopening, transit constraints persist, and the confidence lost cannot simply be restored. For Asia, there is no true safe harbor.

Market Spotlights

From China’s strategic advantage to Southeast Asia’s balancing act, the closure landed unevenly across Asia. For each market, TAG assessed where the opportunities and strains fall, and how long governments can sustain their response.

Sector Spotlights

Beyond energy, TAG examined how Hormuz disruptions are moving through the global economy — tracing compounding effects across industries, supply chains, and markets far from the point of origin.

Simulations

TAG’s proprietary AI simulation modeled how the decisive players — heads of government, central banks, legislatures, and corporate giants — confront an escalating crisis across 50 plausible futures.

Conclusions

The global economy proved more resilient than many expected — but the consequences of the closure will continue to compound. The longer volatility persists, the heavier the burden on Asia.

Political instability, supply chain restructuring, and shifting geopolitical alignments are still working their way through economies and governments across Asia. The vulnerabilities exposed by the closure are broader, deeper, and more interconnected than policymakers and markets understand. China stands out as the principal strategic beneficiary, while the United States faces a paradox: its partners need American markets and energy more than ever, yet the perception of U.S. responsibility for the crisis is pushing many of them to hedge toward Beijing. There is no return to the status quo ante — only decisions about what comes next.